Hi there,

Please consider registering for an account. Registration is free, only takes a minute and will allow you to access members only boards. If you already have an account with us, then click here to login.

Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 79
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.
Please post your fishing report in the reports section, good or bad.



Author Topic: Amendment No. 8  (Read 2074 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline WestwegoManTopic starter

  • Tackle Chief
  • *
  • Segnette Administrator
  • *****
  • Segnette Fishing Team
  • *****
  • Date Registered: May 2008
  • Posts: 239
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Westwego, La.
  • Thanks: 20
  • Gender: Male
  • Release in grease!
  • Referrals: 2
    • Bayou State Fishing
  • Boat: Flat
  • Motor: Yamaha
Amendment No. 8
« on: Oct 20, 2014, 10:40 PM »
Amendment No. 8 needs our attention come election day on Nov. 4th.

Quote
Amendment No. 8 protects the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries-managed Artificial Reef Fund. Since 1986, this Rigs-to-Reefs Program gets its money from oil and gas companies when platforms off our coast are used for artificial reefs.

The short explanation: A corporation declares its intention to donate the platform to the program, and the fund receives half of the money the company saves by not having to dismantle the platform and hauling it to a scrap yard. Most of the platform’s superstructure is removed, then the rig’s above-water structure is cleaned, and if not toppled in place then towed to a reef site, sunk and, voila, we have another fish-holding site.

Since 1986, more than 300 platform “jackets” have been used to establish 70 reef sites off our coast, and it has cost our state nothing. After some wrangling, the fund was used as the state’s match to establish some 30 inshore artificial reefs from Lake Pontchartain west into Calcasieu Lakes.

After so many years of watching the fund grow, then watching the money put to good use to provide fish habitat in our deteriorating marshes, the Jindal administration decided to raid the fund of $44.5 million rather than cut into the budgets of other programs.

The point to be made here is that neither our state’s executive nor the legislative branches shed one ounce of sweat in generating these funds, but were quick to find a quick-fix for their problems instead of sweating to fix funding problems in other areas. The money in the Artificial Reef Program was not their’s to take. Yeah, they believed it was, and there was almost no way to call their hand in court.

Amendment No. 8 will take care of that, and will solve the same problem we had after several administrations believed it was OK to raid the Conservation Fund, the mechanism that drives the LDWF.

The LDWF is only state agency that does not receive State General Fund money. Basically, our license fees, federal funds from taxes on hunting and fishing equipment that track our license sales, and some oil and gas revenues go into the Conservation Fund. We had to have a constitutional amendment to protect that fund from raids, too. The Artificial Reef Fund needs the same protection.
May the fleas of a thousand camels infest the hind end of poachers and may their arms be too short to scratch!!


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
3295 Views
Last post Aug 22, 2012, 10:51 AM
by WestwegoMan



SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal